2.1.0c Hotfix

Why are there so many 2.1.0c hotfixes?

Shouldn't it go like this:

2.1.0c hotfix, 2.1.0d hotfix, 2.1.0e hotfix, etc. etc. ?

"

Darkfyre wrote:

Why are there so many 2.1.0c hotfixes?

Shouldn't it go like this:

2.1.0c hotfix, 2.1.0d hotfix, 2.1.0e hotfix, etc. etc. ?

They're more like "Yo dawg, i heard you like hotfix. So we hotfix our hotfix to revert hotfix :D"

"

Darkfyre wrote:

Why are there so many 2.1.0c hotfixes?

Shouldn't it go like this:

2.1.0c hotfix, 2.1.0d hotfix, 2.1.0e hotfix, etc. etc. ?

No it's always 2.1.0 patch, 2.1.0a patch, 2.1.0a hotfix, 2.1.0b patch, 2.1.0b hotfix, 2.1.0b hotfix... and so on

a new letter means a patch while the hotfixes just fix significant errors that occurred at some time and where found during that time

Nice done GGG, even if a little messy.

Kudos to GGG for taking a second look! Thank you guys, this is way better.


Btw, I don't think there's any shame in having some mess in patching every now and then. It's way better than stubbornly insisting on bad decisions. Respect .).

good choice.

Do these hard caps stack with other sources?
Like temp chains + chill? (75% + 40% = 115%?)

Thank you.

GGG please unsubscribe from ghudda ...