Damage Over Time Changes - Part 1

Will these changes allow for the Trap and Remote Mine support gems to once again boost damage over time on skills? In the past these supports were very powerful in terms of double-dipping but the changes to specify on hit damage hurt many other builds like Caustic Arrow and puncture traps.
Hello, will those changes about calculation apply to Decay? I know that is not strictly a douple dipping, but still, it does use projectile or even spell damage with ED to scale. Will this change? Will Decay be rebalanced if the formula changes?

Thanks a lot.
Wow, fantastic!!!!! ALL these changes sounds VERY interesting!!!!! I have never been a fan of DoT, but this keeps me hyped a lot!!!!

Love you, GGG <3
"
Rory wrote:
For the last several leagues, abilities that use damage over time mechanics such as Poison and Ignite have been present in a large majority of end game builds. These mechanics proved to be some of the most efficient sources of damage.

This is because the base damage for Ignite, Poison and Bleeding is the damage that was taken by an enemy from the hit. So if a hit dealt Fire Damage and caused an Ignite, any modifiers to Fire Damage would apply to the damage of the hit, as well as to the Ignite. Because the hit dealing more damage meant the Ignite had more base damage to scale, this meant such modifiers applying to the hit had a cumulative effect on the Ignite's base damage, in addition to applying normally to the Ignite's Fire Damage value. Similarly, the enemy's Fire Resistance applying to the hit meant the Ignite would have lower base damage, and since the Ignite deals fire damage, it would also then lower the damage taken from the Ignite. This was commonly referred to as "double dipping". Builds that focused on the damage type of the Poison, Bleed or Ignite they caused were capable of receiving a significantly larger increase to their damage from certain passives and skills than builds that didn't use these mechanics.

We've decided to make some changes to this system for a few reasons. Firstly, builds that didn't use Poison or Ignite required significantly more investment to reach the same damage values, and we'd like to level the playing field to bring more builds to a closer power level and progression. Secondly, when balancing the power of items and modifiers, we always had to take the potential for double dipping into account. We had to reduce the power of core passives and common items that are effective for Ignite and Poison builds to the point where they're not worth the investment for other builds. Lastly, Ignite and Poison had to be reduced in power so they were at a desired damage level after heavy investment in effects that "double dipped", making them virtually worthless for builds that didn't take advantage of these systems, creating another trap for players to fall into if they weren't aware of the minutia of the game mechanics.

In the Beta for The Fall of Oriath, we're going to be trying out a new damage over time system. Skills will calculate their Ignite, Poison or Bleed values as a separate damage value, taken straight from the base and added damage of the skill. This will give skills that deal fire damage a minimum and maximum Ignite Damage per Second value that will be rolled on Ignites that the skill causes. Poison, Bleed and Ignite damage values will be based on the base damage of the skill, and then affected by appropriate damage modifiers. Some damage modifiers will affect both the hit and the Ignite, Poison or Bleed, while some may only affect one.

As an example, Ignite can be modified by modifiers to Burning Damage, Fire Damage, Damage Over Time, general damage modifiers, and resistances. This means that Increased Spell, Attack, or Weapon Damage will no longer influence your Ignite, Poison or Bleed damage at all. It also means that while modifiers to Fire Damage will still apply both to a hit and to the Ignite it causes, since the Ignite’s base damage is the same as the hit’s, rather than being the damage the enemy took from the hit, there is no cumulative effect - the modifier applying to the hit has no effect at all on the Ignite - the two are entirely separate.

To compensate for the loss of damage from the removal of "double dipping", the damage of player Ignites, Poisons, and Bleeding have been doubled. Increases to these effects on the passive tree have been boosted as well, and additional Poison and Bleeding bonuses have been added to some weapon clusters, on top of their existing stats.

Bleeding is also being changed for players so that it does more damage while the target is stationary, making it a more versatile source of damage. Previously it dealt only one sixth its damage while the target was stationary, but will now deal half damage instead. The ratio will remain unchanged for Bleeding caused by monsters, so you will still be able to stand still to mitigate the majority of monster Bleeding damage, but monsters you inflict Bleeding on won't be so lucky.

We'll be testing this new system out in the Beta. The goal for Poison and Bleeding is to create an additional mechanic that can be invested in as an optional way to boost your damage with a damage over time component. We intend that if you take Poison or Bleed bonuses in the passive tree and equip items with powerful new ailment damage increases, it will be a reliable way to boost your damage on high health or mobile targets.

The goal for Ignite is to have it be a far more reliable ailment for Fire Damage characters without heavy investment in resistance reduction and double dipping mechanics, while still allowing for a focused Ignite damage build.

We're going to be changing a few existing support gems. An example of this is the Increased Burning Damage Support, which will now grant a multiplicative bonus. We'll be talking about others in the future. We'll also be adding new support gems to further let characters improve damage, give new sources of chances to cause Bleeding, Poison and Ignite, and adding new ways to interact with these effects.

In a subsequent post early next week, we're going to go into some more specifics, like how this change will affect monsters, changes to make Poison and Bleed count as "ailments", and how these ailments will interact with critical strike damage bonuses, and a new keystone.

Reply to this forum post with any questions you have about damage over time mechanics or design, we'll be answering them in a third post in this series.


IDK why it took so long for you to realize that. You introduced double-dip in 1.03 patch, and now fix it in 3.0. You shouldnt intoduce that unfair mechanics into PoE at all, in 1-st place.
Still, i'm glad that you decided to fix it, at last.
IGN: MortalKombat
Molten Strike build guide: https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/1346504

There is no knowledge
That is not power
where is the difference between ignite damage you mentioned and the burning damage other devs regularily refer to?

age and treachery will triumph over youth and skill!
How dot will interact with flat added damage(gems like added chaos or cold), gain +x% as(added fire), conversions(signal fire) and less damage(gmp, lmp) modifiers?
Last edited by NeeMagg#2948 on Apr 27, 2017, 4:17:01 AM
"
MortalKombat3 wrote:
[Quote]

IDK why it took so long for you to realize that. You introduced double-dip in 1.03 patch, and now fix it in 3.0. You shouldnt intoduce that unfair mechanics into PoE at all, in 1-st place.
Still, i'm glad that you decided to fix it, at last.


To be fair back in 1.03 we didn't have anywhere near the amount potential for scaling damage as we do now.
If you want to eliminate double-dipping, fire damage shouldn't buff the ignite as well as the base, nor should chaos damage buff the poison as well as the base.

That would make "ailments" (ignites, bleeds, poisons) effectively three new damage classes, along with chaos, physical and elemental. I guess you don't want to do that, but I can't see why not.

If did eliminate this double-dip, there should be no reason to do this weird calculation of ailments off the base damage instead of off the initial hit that you're proposing. You could still have people invest in the initial hit (which would scale the hit if not using ailments, the hit and the ailment linearly if you are) or invest in ailment scaling (and scale that geometrically).

And if you think that's not enough distinction between the two, have ailments increase their damage as time goes on (as poison stacks currently do until stacks start falling off). That would give players a new strategic choice: try to nuke the boss fast (gaining the defensive boost of there being fewer seconds when the boss is alive to do you damage) or outlast the boss (risking taking damage from the boss over a longer period, but with easier scaling to higher overall dps). The latter is actually better for the game, because players get to experience rather than avoid the boss mechanics you create.

What about minions modifiers? If im making Low Life minion instability explode prolif? Minion Damage will apply twice?
"
CaptainWARLORD wrote:
This isn't gonna change the meta trend. Poison and Ignite builds will still rule regardless.

Reducing the damage scaling isn't gonna do much when it's still broken as a whole mechanic.

and that's why the whole mechanic is changed
#BringBackOriginalScionPortrait
#BringBackOriginalAscendantPortrait
#BringBackCruelMerciless

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info