Make Adorned 0-105 or 0-110

The 100% break point is currently, for all intents and purposes, completely locked down by bots and entirely vulnerable to every form of nefarious TOS violator types. Please make it possible to roll that important break point more than 0.9% of the time, this would not have any influence on balance and they would still be extremely valuable.

I'm confused.....how would that change anything that you have a problem with? Your suggestion would have no effect.

If its true about bots (which I doubt) they would just lock down both if it was valuable and popular at both 100% AND 105/110%....and right now you could just NOT get a 100% and go for the next lower breakpoint for your rolls, at significantly lower cost.

Why should YOUR breakpoint suddenly get privilege over the 100% one? And then why wouldn't that simply replace the 100% as the new best and most expensive? And what do you mean it wouldn't change balance? How does adding a full breakpoint to some rolls not change balance? That's exactly why it was lowered from 150 to 100....to reduce breakpoints and re-balance.

If you doubt the bots you have no business commentating here. You need to reread the original post because absolutely nothing you said made a single bit of sense

If what I wrote made no sense to you.......then you really need to rethink the entire point you are trying to make in this thread.

How exactly is it locked down? https://www.pathofexile.com/trade/search/Keepers/rP0vwbkEHQ

You can get a 100%+ jewel for 400 divines. There's no shortage in jewels.

And that's before we even talk about how little sense your suggestion makes.

100% is literally the maximum roll. The singular pieces are already worth divines, and the chance of hitting that is 1%. You want perfection, you pay the price for it.

Your suggestion has less to do with the fact that bots exist, but you want an easy way to hit the breakpoint. The scarcity of perfect roll Adorned is part of the appeal to be honest

The adorned is already best in slot for basically all meta builds (ie stat stackers), without hitting the 100% unicorn. It doesn't need a buff, and the existance of bots and RMT doesn't change that.

not sure if such a change is needed,but i like the idea

making it 0-110% would do nearly nothing for the rolls above 100%

the reason for this is simple, there are clear breakpoints for stats to get the +1
in most cases its at 66/75/99/100

letting it roll from 0-110 would drasticly increase the odds for hitting these because its no longer just 100 but 100-110 that would make get the +1

sure that would "lower" the value of the jewel,but imo its too rare for what it does atm

"

ciel289#7228 wrote:

not sure if such a change is needed,but i like the idea

making it 0-110% would do nearly nothing for the rolls above 100%

the reason for this is simple, there are clear breakpoints for stats to get the +1
in most cases its at 66/75/99/100

letting it roll from 0-110 would drasticly increase the odds for hitting these because its no longer just 100 but 100-110 that would make get the +1

sure that would "lower" the value of the jewel,but imo its too rare for what it does atm

[Removed by Support]. The idea that it's okay that the 100% breakpoint be over a mirror in league and FIVE DIVINES in standard is crazy even if you take the old 150%ers into account

"

QuietMyth#4144 wrote:

The idea that it's okay that the 100% breakpoint be over a mirror in league and FIVE DIVINES in standard is crazy even if you take the old 150%ers into account

Its NOT over a mirror....that's a straight up lie.

And its 5 divines in standard because everyone and their mother was hunting them when it was first introduced, and there are SO MANY additional breakpoints with the 150% version. That is LITERALLY the reason it was nerfed to 100%.

Plus, Standard market value is absolutely meaningless in any "balance" discussion because the 150% version exists down there.


Your grasp of this item, its value, bots, and how to...fix an issue that doesn't exist is quite tenuous. And the fact that you brought standard into this to "explain" why its current cost in league is unacceptable is proof positive that there is something seriously wrong here in this thread.