1200 fusings, no 6 link

"

Rangers wrote:

I never spent more than 90 fuse to get 6 link.

make me one 6L. I'll pay you 100 fuses :)

There has been spent 5k fusings on my armour without a 6L. 3.3k i used myself, 1.7k was used by its previous owner.

The fusing RNG works for all the times it doesn't drop too far out of the statistics, but for those rare cases where it does not it is an absolute disaster that may even stop people from playing the game.

Why not change it, when clearly it works only for those who are not too unlucky, and the rest we don't talk about.

Save 1 variable for a 6S item, and that is how many fusings used since last 6L. This number can be used in the fusing formula so that there is 100% chance to get the 6L at around 2-2.5k fusings, and that stability in fusing returns are generally greater.

Also, introduce a "are you sure you want to break your 6-Link?", on already 6L items when attempting to fuse or jewel it.

12 Fusings.


19 fusings.


Using Armourer's Scrap really helps.

4500 fusings, no 6Link ... and I want the system to stay as it is.

The only thing I honestly believe should be adjusted are 4 Links. It only happened to me once before but I know a lot of people who constantly have to blow 50+ fusings to get the link, which I think is a bit too harsh.

5 and 6 Links should be seen as luxury, 4 Links as the common alternative.

In the last 2 weeks,

3 fusings

12 fusings

2 fusings

No scraps/whetstones used on any of them.

RNG is RNG.

"

nynyny wrote:

4500 fusings, no 6Link ... and I want the system to stay as it is.

The only thing I honestly believe should be adjusted are 4 Links. It only happened to me once before but I know a lot of people who constantly have to blow 50+ fusings to get the link, which I think is a bit too harsh.

5 and 6 Links should be seen as luxury, 4 Links as the common alternative.

Sure you like the current system. You do lottery lol

"

sanleon wrote:

"

nynyny wrote:

4500 fusings, no 6Link ... and I want the system to stay as it is.

The only thing I honestly believe should be adjusted are 4 Links. It only happened to me once before but I know a lot of people who constantly have to blow 50+ fusings to get the link, which I think is a bit too harsh.

5 and 6 Links should be seen as luxury, 4 Links as the common alternative.

Sure you like the current system. You do lottery lol

And one of them took 7 fusings for which I paid out 12 exalted. The average will always be around ~1200 so I dont really get how the fact that I ran lotteries has anything to do with it, after all if the average was lower I could also payout less exalteds.

Running lotteries is the smartest thing to do with 6 links, theres no point in not running one especially when the odds of each player arent even that bad. The guy who 6 linked one of my Shavronnes got another one on the same day. He made 22 Exalted with 30 fusings in 4 hours. Thats what I call a good investment.

The 4500 fusings I blew in Hardcore where my own and from friends (a lot) though, I didnt run a lottery for those.

6S Sharvonnes

My Stats are as follows:

With 0% quality: 975
With 5% quality: 81
With 10% quality: 123
With 20% quality: 1
Total fusings spent: 1180

5L seen: 5 times
6L seen: 0 times


Getting enraged...

"

Effel wrote:

6S Sharvonnes

My Stats are as follows:

With 0% quality: 975
With 5% quality: 81
With 10% quality: 123
With 20% quality: 1
Total fusings spent: 1180

5L seen: 5 times
6L seen: 0 times


Getting enraged...

lol.. that's just disgusting.

With numbers like that and worse GGG better hope that the no-lifers of this game stay invested otherwise their game will thin out real fast.

I repeatedly 5-6 Link with very few fusings (average about 10).

Like I have said before, y'all with horrible RNG must have done something really bad in a previous life, I must have been a saint.