"
Problem:
Characters who rely solely on Armour are not protected against Elemental Damage.
Solution:
Add more Maximum Elemental Resistances to areas of the passive tree that have Armour in them.
Specifics:
Spoiler
More access to maximum Elemental Resistances has been provided to Armour areas of the Passive Skill Tree in order to shore up the weaknesses of Armour-focused characters.
WOW!!! With 3% more maximum resistance all it's done!! now my Gladiator is very tanky *_*
No more spell block but 85% melee block and 3% more maximum res. That's a great job!! ;-)
Thank you very much for this new breaking patch.
Bye bye POE
|
Posted byElicaone#5876on Oct 22, 2021, 5:13:41 AM
|
|
.
Last edited by Eclypsons#4204 on Oct 22, 2021, 5:18:14 AM
|
Posted byEclypsons#4204on Oct 22, 2021, 5:17:54 AM
|
|
Gonna be busy at work when the league starts but I'll be there later!
To accept a challenge from the Void is merely suicide for the unprepared.
|
Posted byBass956#0375on Oct 22, 2021, 5:18:28 AM
|
|
Soo good :)
|
Posted byBattleFlo#3373on Oct 22, 2021, 5:31:11 AM
|
"
Elicaone wrote:
"
Problem:
Characters who rely solely on Armour are not protected against Elemental Damage.
Solution:
Add more Maximum Elemental Resistances to areas of the passive tree that have Armour in them.
Specifics:
Spoiler
More access to maximum Elemental Resistances has been provided to Armour areas of the Passive Skill Tree in order to shore up the weaknesses of Armour-focused characters.
WOW!!! With 3% more maximum resistance all it's done!! now my Gladiator is very tanky *_*
No more spell block but 85% melee block and 3% more maximum res. That's a great job!! ;-)
Thank you very much for this new breaking patch.
Bye bye POE
math...
100 dmg - 75% = 25dmg
100 dmg - 78% = 22dmg
22dmg x 100 / 25dmg = 88%
75% to 78% = 22% less dmg taken
|
Posted byDonDildo#6137on Oct 22, 2021, 5:59:17 AM
|
|
We need additional Guild ranks guys.
I came in here asking for a raincoat and feel like i walked out of it with a prada bag instead of the raincoat.
Just give us the rain coat pls.
Thanks!
Also the Mysterious Treasure MTX is still broken!
Resident <NiceFX> crafter - https://nicefxguild.com/
Part of the G3 community - https://www.youtube.com/c/goodguygaming3
IGN: Khamatum/Drachten/Riskitbiscuit/Rediash
Account : RedsDead
|
Posted byRedsDead#3344on Oct 22, 2021, 6:02:54 AM
|
|
Hype
Marvin "Big Peepee" Hernandez
|
Posted byelite12#3453on Oct 22, 2021, 6:06:10 AM
|
"
DonDildo wrote:
"
Elicaone wrote:
"
Problem:
Characters who rely solely on Armour are not protected against Elemental Damage.
Solution:
Add more Maximum Elemental Resistances to areas of the passive tree that have Armour in them.
Specifics:
Spoiler
More access to maximum Elemental Resistances has been provided to Armour areas of the Passive Skill Tree in order to shore up the weaknesses of Armour-focused characters.
WOW!!! With 3% more maximum resistance all it's done!! now my Gladiator is very tanky *_*
No more spell block but 85% melee block and 3% more maximum res. That's a great job!! ;-)
Thank you very much for this new breaking patch.
Bye bye POE
math...
100 dmg - 75% = 25dmg
100 dmg - 78% = 22dmg
22dmg x 100 / 25dmg = 88%
75% to 78% = 22% less dmg taken
are you serious?? Explain your math to Atziri Flameblast or Shaper Beam and let me know if it works... :)
12K dmg -> 3K dmg -> 2.6K dmg
What do you think is better between 78% spell block chance and -3% dmg taken?
|
Posted byElicaone#5876on Oct 22, 2021, 6:33:25 AM
|
"
Elicaone wrote:
are you serious?? Explain your math to Atziri Flameblast or Shaper Beam and let me know if it works... :)
12K dmg -> 3K dmg -> 2.6K dmg
What do you think is better between 78% spell block chance and -3% dmg taken?
Shaper beam cares not for your spell block chance and rather just bypass blocks for hitless dot damage. :P
But seriously though if you REALLY want spell block... there's still bone offering necromancer/ascendant to hit those juicy block numbers. :V
|
Posted byPsaakyrn#4256on Oct 22, 2021, 6:39:13 AM
|
|
what is the install folder exactly?
|
Posted byPisicu#5361on Oct 22, 2021, 6:41:06 AM
|
