Changes to Map Conversion Functionality

"

JoeUtopia wrote:

"

Archwizard wrote:

"

JoeShmo wrote:

2 months to basically automate something that could have been done manually by players if allowed to. Seriously.

Don't know why it was so hard to have a remove-only map tab that let you take out maps to place into the existing map tab, ... or you know ... just let players use the maps they do have even if they aren't on the atlas; it's not as if the maps themselves have been removed from the code, and it doesn't affect league servers in the slightest if standard users are still running a map that isn't on the drop pool anymore. If you can have legacy gear, you can have legacy maps. The heck this took 2 months because someone had an existential breakdown with letting players just enjoy what they had earned.

Make map tabs have more space, like scrolling? Oooooh no! Better to wait until something catastrophically breaks and then penalize players for months with a inane "Fix". Gotta uphold the bank account at all costs ( like saying how terrible loot boxes are for players health, but still refusing to remove them because "Shareholders, right?". Uh huh.

Well, at least it's been addressed now.

You're right, you don't know.

Would be nice if everyone bitching and whining could realize that.

And I wish the apologists would ……

The change to the atlas shouldn’t have been done without a process to do this at the same time. I manually did all my maps and, honestly, am rather pissed that I ended up with about 500 Fields and 500 Alleways instead of an equal distribution to the current maps. But we all know GGG doesn’t really care about standard players. And I bought two quad tabs to do this (which are still full of maps) - can I get a refund?

"

JoeUtopia wrote:

At no point did I indicate or speculate on the ease or difficulty in making a correction. I pointed out that the Atlas changes should have waited until a fix was available (which apparently wasn’t too difficult based on the fix we now are getting). My thought is that this was an oversight, which is a totally different discussion. However, in your typical fashion you are trying to change the narrative to what best suites your ability to defend - which is odd, because I never attacked GGG. I did question their decision, but that is what the forums are for in many respects.

"

Archwizard wrote:

Once again, I am not defending GGG, and you are assuming you know how easy/difficult something is in their code base.

You have literally no way of knowing that.

End of point.

"

Archwizard wrote:

"

JoeUtopia wrote:

At no point did I indicate or speculate on the ease or difficulty in making a correction. I pointed out that the Atlas changes should have waited until a fix was available (which apparently wasn’t too difficult based on the fix we now are getting). My thought is that this was an oversight, which is a totally different discussion. However, in your typical fashion you are trying to change the narrative to what best suites your ability to defend - which is odd, because I never attacked GGG. I did question their decision, but that is what the forums are for in many respects.

Once again, I am not defending GGG, and you are assuming you know how easy/difficult something is in their code base.

You have literally no way of knowing that.

End of point.