so what happened to "Ruthless is a side project"?

"

CanelayAzucar wrote:

"

Alsonia wrote:

"

HeroEvermore wrote:

PoE 2 is the side project. With no found success. That is why they decided to keep PoE 1 alive just in case.

Actually this. If Ruthless is the Alpha Framework for PoE2. Game is 100% dead on arrival.

From what we know of those who have already played poe 2, they say that Ruthless is way better than poe 2.

if thats true then...OUCH !

"

CanelayAzucar wrote:

From what we know of those who have already played poe 2, they say that Ruthless is way better than poe 2.

I hope that's hyperbole for GGG's sake, because that's just depressing.

Time to buy diablo 4

I just noticed that the 3.22 patch notes for the ascendancy changes between ruthless and standard for Chieftain and Guardian are nearly identical.


Side project btw!

How can Ruthless and standard have the same bonuses after a sweeping rework where ascendancies were nerfed by like 50% in ruthless? I don't know.

"

CanelayAzucar wrote:

"

Alsonia wrote:

"

HeroEvermore wrote:

PoE 2 is the side project. With no found success. That is why they decided to keep PoE 1 alive just in case.

Actually this. If Ruthless is the Alpha Framework for PoE2. Game is 100% dead on arrival.

From what we know of those who have already played poe 2, they say that Ruthless is way better than poe 2.

so from 10 people who play ruthless and say its better than poe 2 is surely so trust worthy source

I love Ruthless and it's the only reason I still play PoE. That said, GGG should NEVER force Ruthless on players who enjoy normal PoE. It should stay as an alternative mode. Ruthless shouldn't become the direction of the game. It should be an option. PoE2 should be an upgrade for everyone, not just for Ruthless players. Otherwise there will be an outrage and you will lose players.