0.10.0 Patch Notes

"

Dumbledore wrote:

I really just want to say i'm quite disappointed that we are encouraged to pay for coloured/named stash tabs. It just seems to me like that should be a basic game feature. If it improves playability, which im assuming it does greatly, doesn't that make sense?

Don't get me wrong, i've already payed $50 dollars and have no problem spending more. I most likely WILL purchase the coloured tabs because i've already purchased extra tabs and it would feel like a waste not to.

This is the only problem I see with the patch notes.

"

Charan wrote:

I've been reading these responses to all the threads on my phone, and so not replying.

Even though I have what most would consider an abundance of GGGold, I was edgy on the concept of consumable microtransactions and would have preferred a more expensive, permanent solution.

But I think weapon effects should be at the lower end of the scale anyway. The really prestigious stuff should be pets, item skins and perhaps animations. Things that most other games, be they buy-to-play or whatever, don't offer even for free. Weapon effects, on the other hand, are pretty standard -- in most games, you get a sword that deals significant fire damage, it'll probably appear as though on fire.

"

Kabraxis wrote:

Srsly the moderators here must start doing their work instead writing wall of texts about themselves.

Hypothetically speaking, would a ten day probation from yours truly convince you we mods do something more than 'write walls of text about ourselves'? Because I'd be more than glad to oblige.

"

Russell wrote:

I have actually kept away from doing elemental weapon effects. Would be weird to see a guy with a fire axe hitting for cold damage.

"

Russell wrote:

I have actually kept away from doing elemental weapon effects. Would be weird to see a guy with a fire axe hitting for cold damage.