ALL HAIL PRESIDENT TRUMP

"
shoju wrote:
I grew up in a Conservative house. Even my super conservative super christian, parents have turned away from the vileness that has so thoroughly consumed Republicans, and the platform that it once stood for.


Concern Intensifies.

Please tell us which super conservative viewpoints you support that Trump does not.
PoE Origins - Piety's story http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2081910
"
morbo wrote:

Anyway, we begin tonight with a bombshell: Blormpf is done for! Finito!

Donald Trump is DONE


That Trump BBounce! at 0:45 - 0:47
PoE Origins - Piety's story http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2081910
"
DalaiLama wrote:
"
shoju wrote:
I grew up in a Conservative house. Even my super conservative super christian, parents have turned away from the vileness that has so thoroughly consumed Republicans, and the platform that it once stood for.


Concern Intensifies.

Please tell us which super conservative viewpoints you support that Trump does not.



Hmm how about:

Honesty
Fiscal Responsibility
Family Values, including marital vows
Rejection of racist views
Rejection of misogynistic views
Personal integrity
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
bah - forum processing or PEBKAC error ate the post.
PoE Origins - Piety's story http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2081910
Last edited by DalaiLama on Nov 6, 2018, 1:36:41 AM
"
DalaiLama wrote:
bah - forum processing or PEBKAC error ate the post.


I'd give up on arguing on the forums if I were you. Not worth the effort.
(⌐■_■)
"
RPGlitch wrote:
"
DalaiLama wrote:
bah - forum processing or PEBKAC error ate the post.


I'd give up on arguing on the forums if I were you. Not worth the effort.


Hah - pilot error on my part. Sneaky little [ bracket crept into my cut and paste quoting.

Here is what I meant to post:
"
Turtledove wrote:

Hmm how about:
Honesty

"Trump could be the most honest president in modern history"
http://www2.philly.com/philly/opinion/commentary/trump-honesty-https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/post-reply/2031510/quote/15927551presidency-lies-analysis-20181012.html
"
Turtledove wrote:
Fiscal Responsibility

"It's Official: Trump Tax Cuts Are Boosting Growth And Mostly Paying For Themselves "
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/trump-tax-cuts-revenues-deficits-paying-for-themselves/
"
Turtledove wrote:
Family Values, including marital vows

Obama did a better job of marital fidelity. Trump is better than Bill Clinton was in that regard, possibly better than Hillary Clinton too, if insider gossip and rumours are true.
"
Turtledove wrote:
Rejection of racist views



"Timeline: 30 Years of Trump Rejecting Racism, As Reported by MSM"
http://archive.is/wCEQH

"
Turtledove wrote:
Rejection of misogynistic views

Only Rosie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9lcr-wsYOk
"
Turtledove wrote:
Personal integrity

I doubt you've ever met Trump, so vouching for or against his personal integrity would be a long shot. Relying on second hand claims requires vetting those claimants personal integrity and honesty. If you know the second hand people personally, you can probably judge for yourself. If not, you are relying on third parties, or fourth parties and the integrity of the personal integrity claims is suspect.
PoE Origins - Piety's story http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2081910
"
DalaiLama wrote:

Hah - pilot error on my part. Sneaky little [ bracket crept into my cut and paste quoting.

Well, you shouldn't argue with people online because

1. The internet forums tends to attract socially awkward and inept people. And
2. People often make irrational decisions based on their emotions.

1. Means people often will often mistype what they mean in a heated argument.
2. Means people will ignore any evidence they don't agree with unless they get shot in the face with a .45mm in their family home.

For example, from the internet trollery. The easiest way for an trump hater to debunk your claims of Trump's integrity and financial responsibility would be to point to the various news articles by huffington post, CNN, and statements by women supporting their view that Trump is a misogynist and poor businessman and liar about everything.

They believe these news articles because it fits their 'emotional' feelings on Trump, because they don't like what he says.

And unfortunately, a lot of women and men fit into this trap because they tend to have an experience in their life with a shitty guy or have a shitty father and project this feeling on to Trump because of psychological issues they don't resolve.

I know personally of a person who hates trump because his father was a drunk who treated him like shit. And Trump sounds like him.

Never mind, whether the news reporting is 'true' or not. It doesn't matter if the same news article is later proven false by their own staff. It makes them feel good. These women and men had a bad experience with men. So, it's proof enough for them. And they make up whatever excuses and facts to justify their feelings, because society doesn't let you act like a dumbass without a reason.

And this is applicable to religion and a host of various other 'inarguable' topics that often devolve to bickering and asinine insinuations about the definition of words or whether or not their 'source of proof' is believable.

In all, if you don't want to waste your time in this loop of emotionally unstable people, and want to be productive. Don't argue with people online. It's a waste of time.

And Meh. On that point, I wasted my time again. (-_-) bad habit.
(⌐■_■)
"
RPGlitch wrote:


I know personally of a person who hates trump because his father was a drunk who treated him like shit. And Trump sounds like him.


Does this person know that Donald trump is a teetotaler? =0[.]o=
=^[.]^= basic (happy/amused) cheetahmoticon: Whiskers/eye/tear-streak/nose/tear-streak/eye/
whiskers =@[.]@= boggled / =>[.]<= annoyed or angry / ='[.]'= concerned / =0[.]o= confuzzled /
=-[.]-= sad or sleepy / =*[.]*= dazzled / =^[.]~= wink / =~[.]^= naughty wink / =9[.]9= rolleyes #FourYearLie
"
Raycheetah wrote:
"
RPGlitch wrote:

I know personally of a person who hates trump because his father was a drunk who treated him like shit. And Trump sounds like him.


Does this person know that Donald trump is a teetotaler? =0[.]o=

I've mentioned it to him, but the issue was more that his dad was more of an alpha male presence, so Trump rubbed him the wrong way with his speeches. It also doesn't help that he is also 63 and is a mean drunk that beat his wife. Kinda sad how alike some people turn out to be to their parents.
(⌐■_■)
"
DalaiLama wrote:
"
RPGlitch wrote:
"
DalaiLama wrote:
bah - forum processing or PEBKAC error ate the post.


I'd give up on arguing on the forums if I were you. Not worth the effort.


Hah - pilot error on my part. Sneaky little [ bracket crept into my cut and paste quoting.

Here is what I meant to post:
"
Turtledove wrote:

Hmm how about:
Honesty

"Trump could be the most honest president in modern history"
http://www2.philly.com/philly/opinion/commentary/trump-honesty-https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/post-reply/2031510/quote/15927551presidency-lies-analysis-20181012.html
"
Turtledove wrote:
Fiscal Responsibility

"It's Official: Trump Tax Cuts Are Boosting Growth And Mostly Paying For Themselves "
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/trump-tax-cuts-revenues-deficits-paying-for-themselves/
"
Turtledove wrote:
Family Values, including marital vows

Obama did a better job of marital fidelity. Trump is better than Bill Clinton was in that regard, possibly better than Hillary Clinton too, if insider gossip and rumours are true.
"
Turtledove wrote:
Rejection of racist views



"Timeline: 30 Years of Trump Rejecting Racism, As Reported by MSM"
http://archive.is/wCEQH

"
Turtledove wrote:
Rejection of misogynistic views

Only Rosie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9lcr-wsYOk
"
Turtledove wrote:
Personal integrity

I doubt you've ever met Trump, so vouching for or against his personal integrity would be a long shot. Relying on second hand claims requires vetting those claimants personal integrity and honesty. If you know the second hand people personally, you can probably judge for yourself. If not, you are relying on third parties, or fourth parties and the integrity of the personal integrity claims is suspect.


Thanks for reminding me how far removed this thread is from reality.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info