widescreen resolution removed from the game.

Oh, sure, tried to. Failed.

Also, in the case some people don't know, https://www.pathofexile.com/trade/search/Standard is free to use.
Ruthless should be [Removed by Support].
Last edited by AdRonZh3Ro#4713 on Jun 16, 2024, 3:06:44 PM
"
tackle70 wrote:

1 year, 303 days.

Fix it.


1 year, 303 days
There's nothing that need a fix aside of your own hardware.
Flames and madness. I'm so glad I didn't miss the fun.
Yeah, free for buyers, when everything you posted before was about sellers, e.g. "firms":)
Trade forum exists, it's free and it's still used to this day. And who said that it fully represents? You asked a free option, I gave you. Me not using has no correlation either, that's just another fallacy conjured to make a point.

Regardless, nothing, no example i give, no matter the sources, if they aren't perfectly 1:1 to distorted points of view, without even one comma out of place, they are automatically wrong. I never thought I'd see such a vivid example of Invincible Ignorance fallacy (argument by pigheadedness) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies], where a person simply refuses to believe the argument, ignoring any evidence given, but... Desperate indeed.

But I guess the Appeal to Stone, until GGG simply does what they're told by people who think know better, will continue.

"
Echothesis wrote:
You didn't even read reasoning a few posts ago, and threw some adjectives instead.

Refer to Art, he's spot on.
Ruthless should be [Removed by Support].
Last edited by AdRonZh3Ro#4713 on Jun 16, 2024, 6:51:13 PM
Adro, there's a limitation of persuasion via logical argument which is very apparent here. It was Johnathan Swift who said that you cannot reason someone out of something he or she was not reasoned into.

This is a prime example; they know they once had the full UW available. It got removed. They want it back. Any argument in favor is welcome, shoddy as it may be, while any argument against it must be fended off.
The opposite of knowledge is not illiteracy, but the illusion of knowledge.
"
AdRonZh3Ro wrote:
And who said represent? You asked a free option, I gave you. Me not using has no correlation either, that's just another fallacy conjured to make a point.

Regardless, nothing, no example i give, no matter the sources, if they aren't perfectly 1:1 to distorted points of view, without even one comma out of place, they are automatically wrong. I never thought I'd see such a vivid example of Invincible Ignorance fallacy, but boy... Desperate indeed.

But I guess the Appeal to the Stone until GGG simply does what they're told by people who think know better will continue.


You didn't even read reasoning a few posts ago, and threw some adjectives instead. I specifically addressed that trade subforum, and the fact it isn't used in bulk of trading for years.

"
I never thought I'd see such a vivid example of Invincible Ignorance fallacy,


Moderators, hello?:) If I said something like this, it would have been deleted in a few seconds. But when aimed at me, "needlessly negative" and "code of conduct" clauses suddenly disappear?
"
Echothesis wrote:
"
I never thought I'd see such a vivid example of Invincible Ignorance fallacy,


Moderators, hello?:) If I said something like this, it would have been deleted in a few seconds. But when aimed at me, "needlessly negative" and "code of conduct" clauses suddenly disappear?


Why would it need to be moderated? What he described is a debate tactic where a person defends a position simply by refusing to acknowledge how strong the arguments on the other side are.
The opposite of knowledge is not illiteracy, but the illusion of knowledge.
Last edited by ArtCrusade#4438 on Jun 16, 2024, 8:07:29 PM
Guy stated arguments, I have replied to each specifically. Guy started waving hands in the air and calling me names :shrug:. Which actually works for me, guys loosely associated with "white knight movement" never were the target audience. Silent majority was, who can see alternative point of view at least, and decide for themselves whose arguments are making more sense. I never expected to convince those who love GGG designs unconditionally.
"
Echothesis wrote:
I never expected to convince those who love GGG designs unconditionally.


More like you need some proper and valid arguments in order to actually convince someone.
Source: trust me bro is simply not enough.
All those weak or false statements ain't gonna convince anyone, even less if it takes not even a few seconds to find a google search result to prove you or others wrong.
Flames and madness. I'm so glad I didn't miss the fun.
"
Echothesis wrote:
I never expected to convince those who love GGG designs unconditionally.
You have been proven wrong so many times in this thread, it is hard to take anything you contribute to this "discussion" without a grain of salt. Respectfully, everyone knows you are just in here for your personal entertainment.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info